Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olja Hrustic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is clear. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Olja Hrustic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actress: lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing better for WP:ENTERTAINER, simply background characters. SwisterTwister   talk  22:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, I can not agree that she is non-notable actress. I think that the IMDB and the Playbillvault are appropriate and reliable sources. The fact that she has played leading and supporting roles in more than 20 movies and shows is additional reference, which proves that this actress has significant career. I ask you to reconsider your stances. This article deserves to be on Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesko11 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * In my opinion, this article has all necessary references in accordance with Wikipedia policy. I highlight the IMDB as one of the most relevant sites related to the World filmography. It is clear that the Wikipedia`s mission is to increase its database with new articles, which have to be covered with appropriate sources. I appreciate the effort of administrators and contributors who daily patrol new articles, but I also appreciate the work of those who created mentioned article. So, my suggestion is: do not delete. Regards, NatasaGav — Preceding unsigned comment added by NatasaGav (talk • contribs) 22:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)  — NatasaGav (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I present you another reference for mentioned article. It is the Playbill magazine, edition from 2012. On this link you can check it: Olja Hrustic. When you click on "Inside the Playbill" you can read some details from actress` biography. Since the Playbil is a well renowned magazine I suggest you once again to keep this article. Also, via broadway.com you can witness that she used to play in The best man by Gore Vidal. By the way, I still think that the IMDB is well reliable source, since their staff are checking accuracy of editing, similar as on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesko11 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 18 March 2016
 * IMDb is not a reliable source. The Playbill and Broadway.com sources do not represent significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 15:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep has had some prominent roles in feature films, a third and a fourth billing and a lot of tv one-episode billings, am looking for better refs. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Correct me if I am wrong, but in Wikipedia`s article related to the citing IMDb is not stated that IMDb is not a reliable source. There are questions regarding the appropriate and inappropriate uses, but it is an issue for another debate. However, if citing IMDb is not reliable, then we have a problem with a plenty of articles related to living persons from the film industry. I will not point on any of them, but many of articles provide coverage only from IMDb or some tabloids. On the other hand, I cannot agree that The Playbill magazine is not independent reliable source. Since this article provides objective information, I believe that Wikipedia policy is not violated at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesko11 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  17:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. After seven days of a constructive discussion, I have the same stance: this article should be on Wikipedia. I am sure that the Playbill magazine is a reliable source. Also, citing IMDb is not inappropriate. Once again, the information on this article is general and objective. The actress is relatively renowned in the US independent film industry. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesko11 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've un-bolded your second !vote, and struck your third. You only get one !vote per discussion here, although you are welcome to continue to contribute to the discussion. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  01:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Playbill does not contain significant coverage of the subject. IMDb should only by used to cite writing credits marked "WGA" and MPAA ratings reasons supplied by the MPAA.WP:Citing IMDb IMDb contains user-generated content. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - She has been in many notable films. She has plenty of references from reliable sources. I see no reason why she would be considered non-notable. Ethanlu121 (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited. What sources are those? —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet the notability standard for persons nor that for entertainers. Insufficent coverage in reliable third party sources. -- sandgemADDICT yeah? 01:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Uncle Milty, I understood. Talking about her education, the William Esper Studio is quite notable among the schools of performing arts. During her career, she used to work with John Larroquette and Michael Wilson, Robert Rodriguez, Rob Zombie, Maria Beatty etc. There is a lot of references which confirm that cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesko11 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Her credits aren't significant. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Within the Notability (people) article has been stated as follows: “Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.“ It is obvious that her career meets this criteria. Honestly speaking, I do not know which measures you use for assessment whose credits are significant or not. The most important, we should insist on the same standards. I highlight that the independent film industry is much different from the Hollywood A production, thus the notability of actors/ actress varies. We could discuss all day long which production is more artistic, but the point is that both of them should be represented on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesko11 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice, due to lack of significant coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a bunch of bit parts ("Blues girl","student","Russian girlfriend") don't come close to establishing WP:BIO notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.