Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olof K. Gustafsson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Disregarding socks and IPs.  Sandstein  07:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Olof K. Gustafsson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources like ,, and but only as statements from the company. Notability isn't inherited, so just because the company is notable (for scams), this person isn't. doesn't seem to be very reliable. I'm pretty sure is an advertisement, although I don't speak Swedish. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete – no independent notability. The source here is not an advert as such, but it is an interview (of the "plucky youngster plans to become rich" variety) so does not show any notability. --bonadea contributions talk 08:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep – Many of the largest news outlets in the world including Fortune Magazine, Fox News, CNN News and many more have covered this subject. This is clearly far and beyond most articles on Wikipedia. 15 sources of high credibility for an article of a few hundred words with multiple sources for each sentence. -- 08:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:380:53:794:0:0:0:92 (talk)
 * Keep – This is absolutely a keep, the article was nominated for deletion prior in 2016, and at that time it was found to be notable. Since then, there have been interactions with Donald Trump, making this a highly valuable article to keep. -- 14:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , it wasn't "found to be notable". Someone de-PROD'd the article so it wasn't deleted, that's not finding an article to be notable. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Half of the bio is about a couple of Trump-related items, the rest is about the Escobars. There's barely anything about the subject. This is not a notable individual. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep – He is the CEO of a large company which is featured everywhere on the internet. This is a must-keep, and appears this PROD was started by biased people, clearly a keep. -Krimlopio (talk) 19:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , see WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Refer to those when making your argument, avoiding superlatives. Sam-2727 (talk) 23:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked sock. MER-C 19:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep – Notable as written about in large news outlets, in addition seems to have had some significant campaigns in the political field, raising $10 million for an impeachment of Donald Trump is notable by itself.2605:380:32:794:0:0:0:C (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You say the same thing as the other IP address... Sam-2727 (talk) 22:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment and  blocked as socks. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.