Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olufela Olomola (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No clear deletion rationale has been presented and a very recent AfD on the same subject resulted in a clear keep consensus. No need whatsoever to revisit at this early stage. Regardless of the nominator's view, it seems obvious there are WP:OWN issues going to me. The purpose of AfD is to discuss whether a subject is notable for an article. If an editor has issues with content, they should either be bold and make the changes or go to dispute resolution. Fenix down (talk) 09:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Olufela Olomola
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The original Olufela Olomola article created by yours truly, User:Kő Cloch had included more detail than User:HarrisonS4433's replacement. Why is this article not being deleted and my article resurrected? The user in question has performed exactly one edit to their article (when it was created), HarrisonS4433 appears to be somewhat incoherent as I have already left them a message and there has so far been no response whatsoever! Olomola has also never played youth football for Southampton F.C.'s senior team and there is just generally not much info on the player at all, in contrast to my article. Reinstate my article, give me the credit that I deserve for creating the article and then we shall be able to move forward. This has nothing to do with WP:OWNERSHIP - this has resulted from Wikipedia's silly policy towards non-notable players. If Wiki rules didn't stipulate that a player has to have represented a senior team on at least one occasion then I would have inserted my article straight into the mainspace. As I was aware of this problem, I did what I thought was right and managed the article in my userspace. Kő Cloch (talk) 20:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep because no reason for deletion has been stated. If the nominator wants to improve the article with content from a draft then that can be done without deleting what we have already. It doesn't matter one jot who gets the credit for creating an article about a particular subject. The nomination obviously has everything to do with WP:OWNERSHIP, despite the claim to the otherwise of the nominator. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 23:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Kő Cloch has given no valid policy grounds for deletion. Nothing has changed since the previous AfD was closed 10 days ago, so there is no reason for re-opening this discussion. Kő Cloch is correct that the present article says nothing about his youth career - Kő Cloch's draft article had some good content, which ought to be replicated here. I could copy this myself, but would rather that Kő Cloch did it so that he can gain the credit due.  Sussexpeople (talk) 07:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.