Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olusegun Falana v. Kent State University and Alexander J. Seed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The notions for deletion have been countered with the provision of reliable sources. Only one of the sources is linked, but it does provide significant coverage. Per this, and that this has already been relisted twice, closing as no consensus. I will leave it to another user to perform a name change via a page move. North America1000 06:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Olusegun Falana v. Kent State University and Alexander J. Seed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite what the lead says, this is actually a non-notable case. The prod tag that was added by Meatsgains was removed by DGG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not much out there detailing the case. If it were in fact notable, it would have been covered extensively in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I have now added to fairly good sources discussing the article, and areerence showing it's been cited as a precedent 35 times.  DGG ( talk ) 09:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. If this article is kept, it should be moved to Falana v. Kent State Univ. or something similar, to conform to standard article title practice for case names. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree that this article should be moved to that title, which reflects the short-form title found on the slip opinion. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. This is Federal Circuit case has received substantial coverage in legal scholarship. See, for example:   We routinely keep articles about precedent-setting federal circuit court cases, and this article is no exception. Also, kudos to  for improving the article.-- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:43, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.