Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olusola David, Ayibiowu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Olusola David, Ayibiowu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely self-promotional article. Not a single reference to corroborate anything in the article. No sign of notability. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient notability. QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete This autobiography has been dumped on us with no attempt to learn or follow the basic norms of writing a Wikipedia article. Apart from that, it's a pity the "references" have gone now, because Refs 7, 8, 9, in this version showed us three of the newspaper clippings, which could be seen as utterly non-neutral and obviously reliant on the artist's own input. We also have this, the only result available online: a newspaper piece from April 2016 whose opening paragraphs are almost identical to the former Ref 8 from November 2008 (and see the comments below it, "find me on Wikipedia"). There is no evidence that notability can be demonstrated as a basis for any article on this topic Noyster (talk),  13:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

* Comment: Two reason for Disagreement for Article for Deletion Olusola David, Ayibiowu

Hello Justeditingtoday, I totally disagree with your personal interest to this article as being considered for deletion instead of you to help to improve on this article. The reason for creating this article is to promote the Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons as to help improve and contribute to the improvements of the volunteer’s editors in Wikipedia by editing the already existing articles on the Wikipedia encyclopedia and its ongoing activities and programs that promote humanity around the world. For example, Olusola David, Aiyibowu have been contributing photo's and videos to WIKI LOVES AFRICA 2016 Celebrating Africa's Music and Dance on Wikipedia ! This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.WIKI LOVES AFRICA 2016 See the Photo's and Videos ......................... So that’s one the reason why this article by Olusola David, Ayibowu should not be deleted for any reason better for the editors who sees anything wrong it can only help improve on the article instead of proposing its deletion in which I totally disagree for any reason.

* Comment: Secondly another example why I totally disagree is about the contribution that took all my time contribution to the Wikipedia article Wisdom by Olusola David, Ayibiowu also made contribution  to the Wisdom on wikipedia page on the 2 feb 2017 by which he wrote Interpretation of Wisdom, Functionality, Naturally, but made it as an addition to the already existing Wisdom on wikipedia through its own user:Interpretation of wisdom/sandbox link. however an instruction was given to him by the Editor who declined the Submission on 28 January 2017 by Dodger67 (talk). The editor said that the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Wisdom instead.Olusola David, Ayibiowu (talk)


 * Delete the review at AFC of a different page has no bearing on the one under discussion here, except insofar as it demonstrates the author's lack of fluency in writing English, which is further reinforced by the incoherence demonstrated here. Sorry, but your English is simply not good enough to write articles here. You should consider writing in your own language instead. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: There is a serious conflict of interest here. The username of the creator of this article and the article's title are the same. My advice is that the editor should wait till another Wikipedian finds him notable for inclusion on Wikipedia, something I think will not be happening anything soon. Thank you for your donations to Wikiproject Nigeria btw, we appreciate it. Darreg (talk) 23:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

"I think your line of reasoning seems simian" (i.e. 'flaming') will only make things worse by blocking me and also blocked the IP from editing and attacked me for 48 hrs. By recruiting people to your ''Side" won't help.
 * Comment

For example: You recruited dodger67 mentioned in the earlier comments to point out my mistakes and use it against me with an abusive language mentioned in his comment to insult my personality and attacked me as well as the article. But this is due to poor network connections in which I experienced has I was trying to edit the mistake or errors in the comments, but I was blocked at that moment by Justeditingtoday. Also the contributions I made to wisdom page on Wikipedia by the user: Interpretation of Wisdom/sandbox has been deleted by dodger67 during this discussion through this attitude of recruiting people to your side for "Voting" Olusola David, Ayibiowu Article For Deletion. Remember "The Golden Rule: Treat others how you want to be treated". And also "Talk to people the way you want to be talked to".Olusola David, Ayibiowu (talk)

Another reason why Olusola David, Ayibiowu article should be kept and not to be nominated or consider for deletion any longer after this objection, is for historical background of an artist that is now on wikipedia and could serve as an information's from reliable sources, material and instrument for Wikipedia and wikicommons for future use.Olusola David, Ayibiowu (talk) Finally, I reached the conclusion has I appeal to your sense of justice that this Olusola David, Ayibiowu Article should be prevented from being deleted or nominated for deletion at any time from now on Wikipedia because “Nobody knows what tomorrow may bring” or “Nobody knows when the light of life will fade…” Because life can make us ''bitter" or "better". As far as I am concerned any decision reached by the consensus of this community concerning this article would either impact or influence my profession positively or negatively.The reason why I said so, is like for records purpose and future benefits. Especially not to destroy the generation of visual arts in other to raise the level of their commitment to their goals and inspire visual artist's and others to peak performance. In Assume good faith, I've decided to make a key decision to  contribute and help improved more article's  on Wikipedia and also contribute more photos and video's to wikicommons  as a volunteer Editor.This would be notable in the sight of God and Men by the mercy and grace of God.Olusola David, Ayibiowu (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep
 * Comment

I apologize Interpretation of Wisdom/Sandbox is not a self promotional Article as my name his not written anywhere in it but the comment made for voting has been removed Note: It was just a test has I was using it for practice to see how I can improved in some areas because as a new user to know how it works and it's policy. Not Sockpuppet and not for self-promotional Article as being said by justeditingtoday,in Sockpuppet Investigation but for contributing to the already existing Article's on Wikipedia Assume good faithOlusola David, Ayibiowu (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * Delete WP:COI issues not withstanding, zero evidence from third-party sources of WP:BIO notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability, and a search by myself has found nothing that would make this person notable. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.