Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympe Amaury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of French supercentenarians. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 03:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Olympe Amaury

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As with many other such longevity articles contains nothing to justify a stand-alone article. Consists largely of OR, trivia and longevity fanfluff. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PERMASTUB DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 00:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect Yet another WP:NOPAGE situation.  E Eng  10:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Restore Redirect to List of French supercentenarians. Per WP:NOPAGE. Taking out the unsourced longevity trivia (12th oldest, succeeded by, etc) leaves you with a name, age, country and that she had a husband, children and grandchildren. Nothing of interest here. She belongs on a list as per the guidelines at the WP:WOP wikiproject. CommanderLinx (talk) 00:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Funny how this was "conveniently" excluded from Article alerts... 104.56.23.57 (talk) 02:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, even the bots are in on the conspiracy.  E Eng  07:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete with a redirect to the list of French Supercentenarians. Where she stood in the mythical competition to be especially old and how many progeny she had are simply not enough to justify a stand-alone article. Both policy and the guidance at the World's Oldest People wikiproject counsel that this belongs on a list only. David in DC (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.