Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympiq Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. King of ♥   ♦   ♣   ♠  19:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Olympiq_Society
A high-IQ group with twelve members according to the article. Nothing found on Google News; WP and mirrors predominate in first page of ghits. Unreferenced and apparently unverifiable, passing vain and rather advertorial spamcruft which makes Mega Society look like Mensa. For those reasons I suggest delete is in order. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete absolutely Spartaz 14:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete would be the smartest option. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V, WP:N and Google results. Official site has a rank of 873,529 on Alexa. --Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 21:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ORG and WP:V. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 08:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep What's the problem with you people going around and deleting every IQ society there is? You do not apply your criteria to thousands of articles similar to those of IQ societies. That clearly demonstrates both bias and an orchestrated attack on IQ society articles alone, which is abuse of the Wiki policies. Administrators, watch for it! StevanMD 09:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you specify what articles you are referring to? Spartaz 09:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Triple Nine Society, Prometheus Society, The Ultranet, Mega Society has already been delisted. StevanMD 10:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Tiny members' club of negligible interest to outsiders. Landolitan 18:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge anything verifiable to High IQ Society. (I don't think there is anything verifiable, but....) &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V and WP:NN. Whispering 16:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.