Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympus Has Fallen (film series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Olympus Has Fallen. (non-admin closure) -  The   Magnificentist  19:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Olympus Has Fallen (film series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We do not usually have film series articles until at least three films have been made. Would suggest a move to draft until such time, as the third film seems to be in development. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Olympus Has Fallen and do not delete, to preserve page history. Angel Has Fallen is in development, and this indicates a teaser poster at Cannes. So let's not delete this content entirely because while it is too soon for Angel Has Fallen to be for sure (and thus a film series to be sure as well), it should be readily available for restoration if the time comes. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 15:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The Olympus Has Fallen series will soon become a franchise and we all know that Angel Has Fallen is in development. If we do redirect, we should find a better title name for it since only the first film was called Olympus Has Fallen. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Not sure the title is even the right one for this as only the first film was called Olympus Has Fallen. Spanneraol (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment on title even though this isn't the forum for it. The previous title "Has Fallen" fails WP:COMMONNAME as no sources call it that.  A more sensible approach is to name the series after the first film in the series, which is common practice.  Note these sources referring to the third film as Olympus Has Fallen 3.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)



 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Redirect or draftify?
 * Draftify after changing name. Per WP:NCF a better future title would be Has fallen (film series). Pretty much we wait for at least three related projects to make an article on the "film series". We'll have to wait for 2018 for release of Angel Has Fallen, though we'll have an article on it before than, rather than a redirect.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:34, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  19:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep two big-budget films produced and a third in development should be enough for a series page.  No opinion on rename suggestions. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above comments. New film "Angel Has Fallen" in production, and "Olympus Has Fallen" is not the correct series name in any case 173.239.207.50 (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.