Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Khayyam's 130th ruba'i


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Omar Khayyam's 130th ruba'i
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No stand-alone notability shown, and Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam already exists. The bulk of the article is just an English translation, which probably should be put on Wikisource not Wikipedia (providing it's in the public domain).01:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmyshin (talk • contribs) 01:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages because they all contain the same things: what the poem is about, the metre, the most famous English translation by FitzGerald, and 2-3 links that are either WP:PRIMARYSOURCE or translations: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmyshin (talk • contribs) 01:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)



 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:52, 16 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:46, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikisource if we still do that. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and then Wikisource if needed, as there's certainly nothing convincing of any minimal standards of notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Wikisource if not there already. Doug Weller  talk 07:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.