Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Phi Gamma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep, in absence of any deletion argument, advising the currently inactive nominator nevertheless about WP:POINT. Tikiwont (talk) 10:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Omega Phi Gamma

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I have nominated Omega Phi Gamma, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Phi Gamma. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cruzer8 (talk) 06:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Procedural Note - I have notified the nom that he/she failed to provide a rationale, and that this nomination could be Speedy Closed on a procedural basis in the absence of a proposed reason to delete. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * weak keep - The article isn't well-cited, but it passes the Fraternity & Sorority Wikiproject criteria of more than one chapter and has had mention in MSM (see article references). This nomination feels in bad faith as the author brought back Gamma Beta, for it to be speedy deleted, and the nomination is very similar to the one used there. Justinm1978 (talk) 14:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I am the author of the this article. This article has been on Wikipedia for more than a year now, without any problems or objections. I also believe that this deletion nomination is in bad faith - any problems can be discussed on the Discussion page. (|Victor8698 —Preceding comment was added at 18:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Length of time something has been on Wikipedia is not reason enough to end an AfD. A poorly formed and bad-faith nomination is, though. Justinm1978 (talk) 18:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I understand that. Originally I removed the delete tag myself - my fault, but due to the above conversations of a bad-faith nomination of AfD, I motion to have the AfD removed. Victor8698 (talk)
 * Vandalism by user seeking deletion - Also, I would like to point out something about user Cruzer8. Apparently, he tried to change an AfD listing his article about "Gamma Beta" with this article. As pointed out by one of the users, this is not cool and is an act of vandalism. This further illustrates the "bad faith" argument listed above - there was some sort of malicious intent behind this, and for no reason at all. I hope the administrators take more action against him. User:Victor8698|Victor8698]] (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.