Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmenServe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

OmenServe
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

See: Wikipedia:Notability (software). A non-notable IRC script, and only has 660 Ghits which is dismal for internet application. Although the Google test isn't policy, for an internet script something that low indicates non-notability. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 08:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * nom del or merge into Internet Relay Chat or MIRC script.--TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 08:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) / A7 - does not assert notability for web content; or, CSD / G11 - blatant advertising. -- slakr \ talk / 08:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. The first AFD mentions Notability (software), which isn't an actual notability guideline. Moreover, there are literally bajillions of mIRC scripts out there, so merging to mIRC or mIRC script isn't plausible. -- slakr  \ talk / 08:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Strangely enough, as a creator of the article, after a longer meditation I support deletion. I created this when I was new to the Wikipedia - this is the very first article I created. And while the script is well-known, it is not covered by Wikipedia notability guidelines - and what has been bothered me for more then a year is that I also violated WP:COI when creating this article. Some of the content could be merged to Serving channel, though, and create the appropriate redirect. Perhaps do a non-admin close of the AfD? -- Sander Säde  08:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Carter | Talk to me 10:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete, appears totally nn.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It would need 6 more Google hits to be notable. joking aside, it's not notable Sheffield Steel talkstalk 17:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.