Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omen lance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted as blatant and obvious misinformation (CSD G3). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Omen lance

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I have not been able to find any evidence, outside of this article, that the Omen lance described ever existed. Therefore, I believe the article is a hoax. Terrakyte (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources are provided verifying the subject matter. I looked at this when it popped up at newpages and searched Google web and book and found nothing.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Hoax. Total rubbish. Actually, elluding (sic) police in the UK would have been easy. There weren't any at that date. If he was executed in the UK, he couldn't have been put in the catacombs of a cathedral as there weren't any until the next century. I also make him 97 at death - a very good age for anyone, let alone a fugitive, at that time. Peridon (talk) 19:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not going to comment about the User Name... Peridon (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete (G3) as blatant misinformation. I think someone is having some fun "doodling" on Wikipedia. MuZemike  ( talk ) 20:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. A WP:HOAX with no WP:RS. Jonathan321 (talk) 21:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable, no sources, probably a hoax.  Linguist At Large  21:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - a blatant hoax, or at least unverifiable and unsourced and almost in-universe mythology. - Richard Cavell (talk) 23:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.