Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omer Nadeem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Omer Nadeem
The result was   Speedy delete under A7   L'Aquatique   [  talk  ] 00:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seemingly non-notable musician. Declined prod saying "One who has a problem with the information should make a research about the artist on his/her own"; but the onus for improving the article to keep-able standard is on the editor who wants it kept. References are a YouTube video, a blog and a Facebook page.  tomasz.  15:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. The article is written in a very promotional way; I thought it was a WP:COPYVIO but a quick Googling didn't find anything. --  JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 15:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:MUSIC by a mile, and tone is pretty obviously self-promotional. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Fails WP:BAND, WP:N, WP:RS, and it's written as an advertisment. Undead Warrior (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Same as above. BountyHunter2008 (talk) 16:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per reasons stated above. Xeron220 (talk) 17:00, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy spam; regular delete anyway, fails WP:MUSIC. "The name Omer Nadeem may not ring too many bells" -- exactly. --N Shar (talk · contribs) 18:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete As per above.  Lady   Galaxy  23:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.