Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omkar Prasad Baidya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Omkar Prasad Baidya

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It looks far WP:TOOSOON at best for WP:NPROF notability for this 2013 PhD with a handful of articles and few citations. Google scholar profile at. I'm not seeing any reliable sources for GNG. There are several books, but they appear to be self-published, and more importantly, no reviews are apparent for WP:NAUTHOR. No signs of other notability. Article is currently in WP:TNT state anyway. Prodded by, deprodded by IP. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - whopping high citation count of 12 and an h-Index of 5, and none of his positions merit WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel 5969  TT me 22:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly by nom. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC).
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Tripura.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NAUTHOR. LibStar (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Delete – completely useful unsourced and unneeded, per WP:NAUTHOR --Loewstisch (talk) 19:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I disagree with the WP:TNT point, though. WP:TNT doesn’t apply to this article, the subject of which doesn’t meet WP:NOTABILITY guidelines specified in WP:NSCHOLAR, WP:NAUTHOR, and WP:NPROF. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete It doesn't meet the criteria, per WP:NAUTHOR to be kept as an article.Khorang  16:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the many reasons discussed above. I want to stress that we almost never keep articles about assistant professors. Bearian (talk)
 * Delete, fails everything. Additionally the article creator is clearly a UPE . JoelleJay (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.