Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omobono


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:26, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Omobono

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Won a lot of very minor awards but not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 19:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, then redirect to Homobonus as the Italian spelling of his name. No independent notability that I can discern, and non-notable marketing awards don't count for very much.  There are a couple of news mentions, e.g. here and here, but these seem to be purely incidental to something else.  I notice the company doesn't even rate a mention on the page of Peter Owen-Jones, its co-founder.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 01:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, fails WP:GNG. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.