Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omorashi Tenshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Omorashi Tenshi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence that subject satisfies the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. Dōjinshi are generally not notable because they are self published works. Only rarely do they receive coverage by reliable third-party sources. Disputed prod on the bases that the original creator wasn't notified. --Farix (Talk) 16:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete. If you consider a dojinshi a book, this clearly fails WP:BK. This is not notable in and of itself. D ARTH P ANDA talk 20:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 03:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seem a self-published hentai with no references for notability, so I agree that it fails WP:BK. VG &#x260E; 03:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and a notice to anyone who might be looking at this from work: this article is not work safe. Methinks the nom should have at least mentioned this was a watersports manga or something. JuJube (talk) 12:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not that I've searched in Japanese, but I'm finding bumpkis on this one. Appears to fail WP:BK. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.