Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ompen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Ompen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. Non-notable neologism.  role player 21:29, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * delete nonsense; urban dictionary isn't a reliable source and even if it was, it's a dict def. speedy perhaps? --Blowdart | talk 22:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a protologism. Baileypalblue (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * [From the talk page:] Because Wikipedia is not urban dictionary. It is unlikely that you will be able to find a single verifiable, reliable source that shows the notability of this as an actual word. Even if it did exist, it would belong in a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. -- roleplayer 21:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.