Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ončwe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete as obvious hoax. - file lake  shoe  16:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Ončwe

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable. Ioky98 (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep notable. Wily D 13:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. Seriously, cities/villages/hamlets of any size are always considered notable, by longstanding precedent. Nom is terrible, though. Wily D  13:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No, they're not always. Please mind civility in the AfD discussion. The rule of thumb seems to be that a town with a five-figure population is considered to be notable. MuZemike  ( talk ) 16:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it isn't. Every town of every size is always kept.  American towns were all created by bot, every single one down to populations of <10. And please read WP:CIVIL before attenpting to enforce it.  The nomination is horrible.  Absolutely terrible.  This is not a problematic statement under WP:CIVIL.  Wily D  17:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. WilyD is correct that populated places are almost invariably kept if their existence can be verified (WP:V). In this case, I can't find a place labeled as Ončwe "around 7 km northwest of Třebič" on Google Maps, and Google Web, Google Books, Google Scholar, and Google News searches for the name turn up nothing. Rather than snipe at each other, why doesn't someone try to turn up at least one reliable source establishing this place's existence? I can see no way of keeping the article otherwise. Deor (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- unless a source can be found that proves this place even exists. Google turns up nothing except misspellings of the word "once". Reyk YO!  20:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as hoax. This hamlet is nonexistent. See Mapy.cz--Yopie 13:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Hoax. - Darwinek (talk) 00:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Hoax. - JanSuchy (talk) 07:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Non-existing place, hoax. - --Vejvančický (talk) 09:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.