Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On-the-job


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob ert  00:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

On-the-job & off-the-job training
Un-encyclopaedic and unneeded. Listed as potential merger to Training, but a delete vote would probably be preferable.  haz  (user talk) e 12:10, 26 February 2006
 * Delete. Can't see anything here that isn't covered better in training. --Malthusian (talk) 13:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I stumbled across this when I was writing a requested stub (EKG tech), I was looking for a link for something to do with on the job training. While On-the-job & off-the-job training is crappy, that's call for improvement not deletion. I note Training doesn't mention the phrase at all. Ifnord 14:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with training. -- 9cds(talk) 18:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. The artcile on Training will gain nothing from a merge. Jporcaro 21:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless to training. -- Krash (Talk) 15:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Was going to vote merge, but have included the material into training, so now delete. Kcordina 09:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The entire article is included in one of the paragraphs in training. TheConsortium 23:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.