Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On:Q


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

On:Q

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The subject is not notable enough to have its own article, as evidenced by its lack of any independent references. Because the subject hasn't been covered by independent sources, the article only serves as advertising for the product-- Lester  10:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Strip the advertising and POV and merge remaining verifiable information with Quantas. 2 says you, says two 13:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: It already has a whole section at Qantas. Even there it lacks secondary sources.-- Lester  12:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete and merge with Qantas article per 2 and Lester. Non-notable and already has its own section on the Qantas article. --Stickee (talk)  00:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with below, no need to merge. Already undersourced as it is. --Stickee (talk)  12:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete already covered at Qantas. Not sufficiently sourced. Not significant enough for separate article. Dloh cierekim  01:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge with Quantas as suggested above.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 02:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with Dlohcierekim... Not sourced enough and should be just deleted. Pmedema (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.