Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnAir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-19 06:35Z

OnAir

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Company in question may be notable, but sparse on sources. AfD should evaluate whether WP:CORP satisfied. Delete. Xoloz 20:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete. . Mukadderat 17:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep and expand A few sources like this and this in some tech magazines (A Google news archive search turns up quite a few) suggest notablilty. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 03:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I'm not totally convinced by those sources, but I think they're enough to keep the article and try to make it better. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I'm convinced too. -UniReb (Talk) 18:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.