Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnTrack TimeTracker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

OnTrack TimeTracker

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Borderline WP:SPAM, no indication of notability per WP:GNG, no WP:Secondary sources cited, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod contested by creator. Top Jim (talk) 11:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Top Jim (talk) 11:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and as spam. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 14:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely advertising page for a mobile phone time tracking application. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - it is not borderline. Bearian (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have written this article as a companion article to Comparison_of_time_tracking_software, which gives an overview of all time tracking software. I believe OnTrack should be listed there for completeness. The OnTrack_TimeTracker article is written completely analogous to other articles given in that overview such as Visual_TimeAnalyzer, True_Time_Tracker, ActiTIME and many others. I see no difference between these articles and OnTrack_TimeTracker and therefore why it should be deleted. I would be glad to improve the article if I would know how to. 13:06, 10 November 2010 (UTC) Bert — Bertvh (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.