Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On a Sensual Note (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to List of collegiate a capella groups (might as well). Mango juice talk 15:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

On a Sensual Note
College a cappella group which doesn't meet the standards of WP:MUSIC. The first nomination, which was closed as no consensus, contained such gems as "Sorry if you Wikipedia snobs think that it is unworthy." savidan(talk) (e@) 09:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of collegiate a cappella groups. --ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch \ talk 10:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, unless every collegiate a cappella group is deleted as well. The "some are more notable than others" argument is exceptionally weak, even in the case of the Whiffenpoofs. No one outside of a cappella and New Haven knows who they are, even the presidents they've sung for. --SparqMan 16:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This is not a rationale for keep. I've nominated a lot of less-than-notable a cappella groups for deletion. If you think there are others that don't meet the standards, nominate them for deletion. If all the other articles jumped off a bridge...you get the picture. savidan(talk) (e@) 23:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Armon 16:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficiently notable per WP:MUSIC.  No sources per WP:V. (No need to merge; entry is already listed at List of collegiate a cappella groups.) -- Satori Son 12:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.