Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Floor (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

On the Floor (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not convinced this is notable per WP:GNG, also and more specifically, its not notable per WP:NALBUMS as it has little information beyond a track listing and thus without charting or critical reception etc. the article serves little purpose as it lacks considerable context. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - This is a tough one for me to decide on, personally. My rationale is that the artist has made it onto the charts with her second album (granted it wasn't a major chart like the Billboard 200), and therefore the artist is notable, but not as notable, say, as Alicia Keys or many others.  My only argument towards keeping is not to punch a hole in the discography.  The reason my Keep is so weak is because the eponymous album also is not shown to have charted and might be AfDable as well.  The question is regarding whether the charting for the second album is unnotable enough to warrant punching holes in the discography.  We had a discussion about Short Stories that resulted in a keep due to Billboard coverage despite never charting; did this album and artist attain any coverage within Billboard?  That might be the determining factor here.  CycloneGU (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm nominating and requesting deletion based on the other principles of WP:NALBUMS, if there is no information beyond a track listing, then an independent page is NOT required. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  00:50, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sumsum2010 · T · C  04:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Redirect to the article on Adassa. This seems standard practice for the non-notable albums of marginally notable artists.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  08:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.