Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Jews and their Lies/primary text


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy per consensus and lack of content. Shell babelfish 01:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

On the Jews and their Lies/primary text

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a gallery of scanned pages from a book. These were uploaded and put on this subpage of On the Jews and their Lies. Several problems with this... we don't keep subpages in main space, articles that aren't really articles don't belong here but on Commons and the purpose of this subpage would be better suited for Wikibooks. Either way it needs to be deleted from main space. Please note that I'm not nominating the main article nor am I making any assertions that the book is not notable or should be ignored. Please keep that in mind, thank you. MartinDK 20:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Gotta agree; on the basis of the title alone, much less whats in it (or lack therof) it needs to go, there is already another place for the book itself. Gtadoc 20:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Transwiki to de.wikisource, where somebody might actually have some idea what to do with this. JulesH 20:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete do we need to keep this in any wikisource or commons really? The page scans have no place in the main article space, and need to go.  If somebody on another wikimedia project needs the pages for an article or another project then it can be transwikied or uploaded again, but barring that, delete.  --Wingsandsword 20:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, don't transwiki. If it were text, I'd say to transwiki, but this is page scans, I doubt if Wikisource wants it.  Corvus cornix 20:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - If this were in article main space, the article may have met CSD A1, CSD A2, and CSD A3. Being an article subpage, Miscellaneous for Deletion might have been more appropriate. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 21:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * MfD is not for pages or subpages in main space. The confusion over what speedy criteria to use is what made me bring this to AfD instead. I've had bad luck in the past with speedy and articles of this kind and within this subject. If in doubt, seek consensus which is what I'm doing now. MartinDK 23:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above and obvious legal issues (libel and slander). Bearian 21:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I fail to see how a book written in 1543 could possibly be conceived as libellous or slanderous, both of which offences may only occur (in most jurisdictions) when making statements about a living person. JulesH 22:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No doubts Taprobanus 22:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't think of a good reason for speedy delete on this one, but...well, this is an image gallery, if you want to go that route. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Pagescans do NOT belong on Wikipedia. Tagged under the G6 Housekeeping CSD criteria Rackabello 23:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.