Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the attack and more


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 08:16, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

On the attack and more
A non-notable album from a band, 20 Fingers, that fails WP:MUSIC (which I've already tagged for speedy deletion). Note that the article only says that the album was "released" but never necessarily published. –Sommers (Talk) 22:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * comment: It is being sold. This means it has been published? --Easyas12c 22:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * comment: See also Talk:20 Fingers, for discussion about the group. --Easyas12c 22:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I have three singles from this album, from different dance collection CD's. This was 90's novelty dance group with moderate sales.  "Mr Personality", "Short Short Man" and "Lick It" were released as singles.  USA 1995 year-end chart was #76 for "Short Dick Man" and "Short Short Man" hit #6 in Australia, I'm sure the other singles have similar sales but that's a quick look.  Ruby 23:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I guess it sounds good to me then -- I nominated the article because it none of this was asserted in the article and it looked like a notability problem. If you can add some factual material to both 20 Fingers and On the attack and more that will satisfy WP:MUSIC, please do so. I'd hate to see articles get deleted because they appeared non-notable simply because they were incomplete. (Incidentally, if you feel that I made an error in judgment in nominating this article or in tagging 20 Fingers, please tell me and explain. I'd like to learn not to make such mistakes.) Thanks for your attention to this. –Sommers (Talk) 01:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability question seems to have been answered. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 07:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.