Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onai Chingawo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify to Draft:Onai Chingawo.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 19:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Onai Chingawo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Are there multiple IRS? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 20:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Zimbabwe. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify (to not say keep) – Found sources → – Nominator, seeing the current appearance of the article is not enough to nominate. Please, search for sources before doing this type of nominations.--MonFrontieres (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by MF. GiantSnowman 19:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes GNG. Simione001 (talk) 05:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. Regarding the sources from MonFrontieres: the first has zero independent secondary coverage of her, as it merely repeats quotes from her and her coach from a press release. The second I can't access -- does it have SIGCOV? The third is pure tabloid trash, and also is almost entirely quotes from her and her husband, with only a single sentence from the interviewer that is about her. So right now, even if the second source has SIGCOV, the subject fails GNG as multiple sources are needed. JoelleJay (talk) 00:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The source should be enough to push her over the GNG line. EternalNomad (talk) 02:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That's one source. GNG needs multiple. JoelleJay (talk) 19:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark (talk) 20:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify. The Newsday article is promising, but is only one IRS and comprises just 7 brief sentences. No one has described what the Herald article contains so I can't justify keeping yet. JoelleJay (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per sources found by MonFrontieres and . Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:17, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Das osmnezz Since you've apparently read all the sources, can you tell us what's in the Herald article? JoelleJay (talk) 22:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify. WP:GNG requires multiple examples of WP:SIGCOV; we only have one. BilledMammal (talk) 05:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Draftify The article isn't okay for mainspace currently but I feel MonFrontieres can work on this whilst in draft. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  17:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.