Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Once Upon A Time In Mumbai (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure). - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 16:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Once Upon A Time In Mumbai
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a movie promo, and no references as well KrishGR (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 15:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * NOTE: Previous AfD here. PC78 (talk) 15:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * delete no reliable sources or anything else that would establish notability? No encyclopedia article.Bali ultimate (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:AFTER. Article is now encyclopedic and properly formatted per MOS.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What's the relationship between "under production" and "principal photography has begun"? Anyway keep, looks like an encylopedic topic now it's been fixed up. Nerfari (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article now looks established and legitimate.  D r e a m Focus  22:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep sources now seem to exist. Please be careful to follow WP:BEFORE. Hobit (talk) 02:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:AFTER. Article is now properly formatted with refference added. --Incognito1980 09:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Incognito1980 (talk • contribs)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep --The article is sourced, and notability has been established. --J.Mundo (talk) 14:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.