Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Once Upon a Time in Peckham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Only Fools and Horses.  MBisanz  talk 02:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Once Upon a Time in Peckham

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apppears to have been a rumoured show for quite some time - no reliable sources either. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. D.M.N. (talk) 15:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete, per nom. This show may never see the light of day. Pyrrhus16 (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, unverified. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of sources available for anyone who looks for them.     etc. As a proposed prequel to the UK's most popular sitcom of all time (according to numerous surveys), this is clearly notable, whether it gets produced or not. JulesH (talk) 19:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and set Redirect to Only Fools and Horses. With respects to User:JulesH, as he is quite correct in that the proposed prequel is getting coverage in reliable sources that meet WP:GNG and that this attention does give the information a certain notability per guidelines, but since this is still at the pre-production stage, represents an idea from 1997, has not yet even been definitely cast, and despite the BBC announcing plans and scripts having been written, production has not begun and a seperate article is premature. A merge to the parent article protects the information and the sourcing, and will be available exactly where readers might expect to find it at this early stage, even if the prequel is never filmed. Once production begins, a seperate article might well be welcomed.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. JamesBurns (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  01:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect as suggested by Schmidt. There are certainly reliable sources and it does seem to meet WP:GNG, but is not ready to have its own article. FaerieInGrey (talk) 02:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect. The subject has been covered in reliable sources, but the status of the production means it's not ready for a separate article. - Mgm|(talk) 10:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect as suggested by Schmidt until it warrants its own article PaulJones (talk) 00:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.