Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One, Two, Three, Four


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ha! I remember this 7". Sadly, it's lacking in notability and should just be mentioned in their discography. SarahStierch (talk) 00:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

One, Two, Three, Four

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable album. Did not chart. No singles. Don't see any reviews. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:46, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge the tracklisting and redirect to Jimmy Eat World discography per my rationale in deprodding it. I can't see any case for deleting this and not merging and redirecting. --Michig (talk) 16:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, don't merge. Tracklistings are not included in discographies even when the records don't have their own article, as per the proposed guidelines and wiki-wide practice. Trinitresque (talk) 07:45, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * That proposed guideline only states that tracklistings should not be included for a release which is the subject of a separate article. --Michig (talk) 08:51, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree with Michig. Track listing can be included if there is no feature article. This would be an ideal case. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - Wikipedia is supposed to have discographies on all notable artists. Jimmy Eat World is clearly notable, so an EP of theirs is notable, I can find citations for the content easily if that's the real problem. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:NALBUMS "That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 21:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge or delete. Either way, the EP itself is not notable. 1292simon (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * STRONG Delete - Lacks reliable sources. Lacks Notability. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.