Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneDome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger One ping only 02:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

OneDome

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NWEB or WP:CORPDEPTH; references are to trade press sources and are run-of-the-mill product reviews and funding announcements. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I'd think The Times and Telegraph would be good sources to cite. In addition to these here are some other sources in which OneDome has been mentioned; Startacus, The Negotiator , Manchester Evening News , Disruption Hub, Property Industry Eye, and Superb Crew.

Perhaps most interesting; Huffington Post

I hope this helps and would be more than happy to rewrite and add these sources to the article if the community feels this addition would suffice. KentVorland (talk) 10:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

More mentions in the news for OneDome:

- Dartford Living

- Kent Online KentVorland (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- promotionalism for a nn startup of 45 ppl; does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Coverage is WP:SPIP or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:59, 18 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.