Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneSavings Bank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  HurricaneFan 25  00:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

OneSavings Bank

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable bank, fails WP:CORP. No significant coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. ukexpat (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, has significant coverage  . Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep – per sources above posted by User:Alessandra Napolitano. Topic passes the General notability guideline. Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a significant and notable bank with much coverage, as mentioned. Also the Kent Reliance Building Society, from which the bank was formed, has long had its own article. Buybooks Marius (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage referenced in article is fine.  D r e a m Focus  01:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.