Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Cool Guy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 07:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

One Cool Guy


No notability, no legitimate citibale sources, seems to be written by band members itself to honor them. Payneos 16:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. You know a band isn't notable when it's fans are listed in the article. Stebbins 00:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Am I the only one who thinks its funny that this article includes the phrase "at the height of their popularity"?--Dmz5 06:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Laughable. WMMartin 18:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article needs some work, but One Cool Guy was important in the development of third-wave ska. Amphytrite 05:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was G4 delete by User:Rama's Arrow. [procedural close by non-admin] (|--   UlT i MuS  04:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

One Cool Guy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Again, fails to meet policy standards in WP:MUSIC, no legitimate citable sources, and is not notable in any fashion. Continues to stand to simply honor the band. Payneos 19:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. ObtuseAngle 22:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.