Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Horse Town


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mr.Z-man 15:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

One Horse Town

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No content, sources, or notability for an article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Blue Moves. Useful information could be lost if simply deleted. --JD554 (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is some extensive coverage. --Oakshade (talk) 10:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect as a plausible search term to Blue Moves. The song has gained no awards, no chartage, no covers. Nothing to merge since none of it is verified with reliable, third-party, sources.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * In fact much of it is verified with a reliable third party source. --Oakshade (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * One book isn't the multiple reliable sources needed by WP:NSONGS or WP:GNG. --JD554 (talk) 09:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:NSONGS or WP:GNG does not require "multiple" sources, just that the coverage is significant. WP:N only states "Multiple sources are generally preferred."--Oakshade (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * When did that happen? It used to be multiple and it's clear and unambiguous. "Significant" is a phrase that just asks for trouble. What I consider significant might be trivial to someone else. - Mgm|(talk) 10:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Just another example of ambiguous and seemingly self-contradictory wording of our guidelines which instigates endless debate over the interpretation of them. --Oakshade (talk) 01:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Rewrite into a etymological history of the term, and the towns it labels, instead of being about the song which uses the term as its title. 76.66.202.139 (talk) 06:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The correct location for that would be One-horse town which appears to be free. --JD554 (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —-- Avant-garde a clue - hexa  Chord 2  10:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.