Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Magnificent Morning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Network has officially announced block's existence and plenty of neutral industry sources than the usual questionable kidvid blogs now exist.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

One Magnificent Morning

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article about a children's program block on The CW allegedly premiering in October is a case of WP:TOOSOON. First source is a clear WP:ADVERT merely mentioning the block has shows ready for purchase but without information about being in production or not, while source #2 has reliability problems in which the article is basically a lot of spec that comes down to 'the companies had no comment on these rumors', while #3 just rewrites the second story for another website while combining #1's program description boilerplates. Another barely more reliable source is available here, but again rehashes #2 with only the addition of a 'yes we're ending the block that precedes it, but no further comment'; no further sources have been found besides that (the rest are mirrors, search term clickbait and YouTube news reaction videos, with only one other newsorg reporting the story as a morning news time-filler sourced by #2). I have attempted to enforce WP:RELIABLE with the editors adding this to Vortexx and The CW and that we're not under a deadline to wait for more info to come out, but to no avail.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge with Vortexx until further notice. While it may be a little early for an article, it has been confirmed by Anime News Network, a reputable source, that Vortexx is leaving for One Magnificent Morning.MadManAmeica (talk) 18:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Multiple sources have now confirmed the launch of the block, including more reputable ones such as TVNewsCheck and Broadcasting & Cable. I have substantially revised the article to include these and other sources. TVtonightOKC (talk) 20:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as the rationale for the AFD no longer applies. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 00:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.