Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Night of Queen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  chat 23:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

One Night of Queen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Generic tribute act, sources are all trivial, listings or self-sourced. Well, I suppose one could almost count the Grauniad review that said they were not terribly good. Guy (Help!) 21:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 17:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Coverage in reliable sources is quite abundant. Much is behind pay walls but these are all concert reviews that establish this as a notable show: The Scotsman, Pegasus News, Highland News. -- Whpq (talk) 17:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Is it likely that this article will be searched for by our readers? Yes. It has received 500+ hits per month consistently for over a year. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 19:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * keep content with reviews and sourcing available indicating notability. Article can be improved though but thats for a seperate discussion on the page itself Ottawa4ever (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. One of the more notable tribute acts. Plenty of coverage on Google News. Probably one of the half-dozen most notable tribute acts around at the moment, even if their "Bohemian Rhapsody" leaves something to be desired. What exactly is a 'generic tribute act' anyway? --Michig (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.