Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Water


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 14:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

One Water

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced, no real indication of notability that I can see. Using AFD instead of A7-CSD in case I am missing something. TexasAndroid (talk) 11:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly, per nomination. This is a company .... that raises funds by selling a range of products and services under the brand name "One" including its own brand of water.  Closest thing I found to a reliable source was this human interest story from the Times Literary Supplement about the founder, amid hundreds of irrelevant hits; Google may not help much here.  When you add the name "Goose" to "One Water" the results are somewhat more promising, but most relevant coverage is puff pieces about the launch of the business. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:00, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom, no real notability. Codf1977 (talk) 21:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As I commented at the AfD for the companion article, Articles for deletion/One Difference, it's hard to even find independent verification that this company or organization or charity or whatever it is exists. Maybe an article could be written about the parent company or organization, Global Ethics, if sourcing can be found. --MelanieN (talk) 04:24, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.