Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One cheek sneak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

One cheek sneak

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary or a "how-to" manual. PROD removed by page author who must've figured I objected to the link to Urban Dictionary itself. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 19:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely not an encyclopedic subject; dicdef meets how-to meets silent-but-deadly. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete No reliable third-party sources and no hint of notability are the top 2 problems. I checked several search engines (LexisNexis, Factiva, Google News, etc.), but I couldn't find a single article on this subject. As it stands, it reads like the original research of a rather unencyclopedic subject. Wikipedia is not a "how-to" guide. J Readings (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism with no evidence of notability or sources. ~ mazca talk 22:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads more like an Urban Dictionary entry then a Wikipedia article. §hep   •   ¡Talk to me!  21:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.