Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One crazy ride


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 04:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

One crazy ride

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Listed after PROD was removed (without resolving any of the issues). Unremarkable film. No citations establishing notability. Fails WP:GNG. –  Richard  BB  16:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:24, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:36, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:36, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Return to author for continued work. This brand new article was proposed for deletion while being actively edited, and yes... the newcomer removed the prod without immediately addressing issues of format, style, and sourcing. But the thing is not completely unsourcable, and I think the project might eventually have a fine editor if brand new contributor User:Deepadeepa is allowed to continue his OUT of article space. Send him to WP:PRIMER, WP:NF, WP:RS and WP:GNG. Let him ask questions of more experienced editors.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:58, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Struck my initial !vote per improvements.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has somewhat substantially improved. No need to userfy. Remarkable film. Has citations establishing notability. Passes WP:GNG. Cheers.  Bonkers The Clown  (Nonsensical Babble) 10:09, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per massive improvements made. Major kudos to User:Bonkers The Clown. Nicely and speedily done.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep in the spirit of WP:HEY. I have added some citations. Film has mention in numerous sites and newspapers. Film has won awards globally. More work is needed on citations. Also describes journey across Arunachal Pradesh state which has very limited wikipedia content. Arunram (talk) 20:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep A little too hasty: WP:BITE. As it currently stands, this is a credible start and should be kept. — Maile  (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think its meets notability requirements, but I would disagree with it being in a credible condition, the lists and some of the sources are dodgy to say the least, bare url in the article itself? Needs considerable prose work from reliable sources to be satisfactory, preferably with some background info on production and filming.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  14:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.