Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One on one value debate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 14:11, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

One on one value debate

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

most likely exist in better form (see:Debate), does not establish notability. &eta;oian  &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  02:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, as essentially a dictionary definition, per WP:DICTDEF. Nsk92 (talk) 03:20, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources. I got a kick out of the last bit though. WillOakland (talk) 03:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Lack of sources (in that none have been provided) is not a reason for deletion. "Articles for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed" may be considered for deletion. kilbad (talk) 04:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is a stub that cannot be expanded without substantially copying existing material. (I don't think a redirect to Debate is useful in this case) - Mgm|(talk) 13:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.