Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onelastbugfixprogramming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 02:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Onelastbugfixprogramming

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced, probably original research; prod was contested, so listing here. GJD 19:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, and why is the title one word? Useight 20:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same reasons I gave earlier: Dictionary definition, original research, unsourced neologism.--Wafulz 21:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and WP:ATT. If somehow it gets kept, it needs to be renamed following standard WP naming conventions -- not all as one run-on word.--Ace of Swords 22:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete original research. (lemon flash)  talk  23:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete interesting, probably true, but not verifiable (and I did look). Dhaluza 00:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 08:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not even in hacker's jargon dictionary. Pavel Vozenilek 02:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.