Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ones and 0s


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Ones and 0s

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

contested prod nn album by nn artist also unsourcedOo7565 (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * comment the person who removed prod said this in his or her edit summary Of course it's a notable album. Well the artist may not be notable and the album may not be notable, but the album is pretty popular within the podcasting communityOo7565 (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - My reason for opposing the deletion is because it was created (along with 2 other articles) to make the article Geoff Smith (American musician), look more professional. This is what it looked like before. I know that none of Geoff Smith's albums are notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. But Geoff Smith is well known in the podcasting community and has gained considerable fame there. And that's reason enough to keep it and improve it. --Taylor Karras (talk) 18:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If he's so well known then he needs to be just as well sourced. --Teancum (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * On second thought... --Taylor Karras (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - no true notability, nor does the artist's article have any. --Teancum (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - First, no article should exist to "make another article look more professional." Second, if you know none of his articles are notable enough to include in Wikipedia, why did you remove the prod? Notable or not is the only question, if you yourself do not believe they are notable, you should have supported, not contested the prod.  Third, being "well known in the podcasting community" is NOT reason enough to keep the article, unless one can provide evidence for their claim.  Theseeker4 (talk) 19:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * One, because the ugly list containing the albums really make the article look ugly. Two, I don't know the exact reason, though the article Geoff Smith (American musician) should be nominated for deletion as well. Three, I don't know but here and maybe a few other source. I'm not exactly sure. --Taylor Karras (talk) 19:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Abstain --Taylor Karras (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - On second thought, non-notable, non-expandable (can't find any information to expand this article), please delete. --Taylor Karras (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to artist's article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It already was... Though it was directly copied from Geoff Smith's website. --Taylor Karras (talk) 16:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.