Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oneworld.net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Oneworld.net

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY Hu12 (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Please specify as to how it fails WP:N. - Mgm|(talk) 15:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Its a prominent website, going for over 10 years, and is well know human rights website. scope_creep (talk) 11:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per scope_creep. - Mgm|(talk) 15:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems reasonably sourced and complies with notability criteria. Rudget . talk  17:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: well-known website. There are sources, notability criteria is fine. Maksdo (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Only one of the sources is independent of the subject, which seems to violate the preference of WP:N for multiple sources. At a minimum, the article needs to be improved. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * keep this also please the website is very well known and meets the criterias we have for them yuckfoo (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.