Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onfido


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Onfido

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indications of notability, except that one if its founders was once included in one of Forbes' countless lists of people. Not sure there is point in keeping the article. — kashmiri  TALK  11:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weakish Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per a review of available sources. North America1000 00:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON; the company is not yet notable per available source. The article & available sources are solely about "foundation story"; funding; "Accolades" and company aspirations. Fairly typical "This-tech-startup-is-the-next-great-thing" content with no value to the general reader just yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SUSTAINED.  WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG aren't enough for a new company, because the start of a company is an ephemeral event.  Wikipedia can wait to see if this startup succeeds.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG and certainly fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Various sources are quotes and interviews (therefore fail WP:RS) and PR pieces. Probably WP:TOOSOON. -- HighKing ++ 15:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.