Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onie Ponder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Onie Ponder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of the type of sustained coverage that would meet the guidelines at WP:N; most of what is here and findable online is routine coverage, primarily obituaries, as well as one or two local interest pieces, but nothing that establishes the notability of the subject. There's no Wikipedia policy or consensus that states that the oldest anything is automatically notable by the encyclopedia's standards; numerous AfDs on the "oldest" individuals have been kept or deleted based on their individual merits. Thus we default to the general notability guidelines and any material of encyclopedic merit can be included on the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. Canadian  Paul  20:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Also, "File:Onie Ponder.jpg" was nominated for speedy deletion as copyvio., uploader of File:Onie Ponder.jpg, was permanently editing blocked in November 2015.Inception2010 (talk) 22:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Also fails WP:GNG as all sources are from Florida which would be local coverage since she lived in the area. I'm not seeing a good redirect since she isn't old enough to be mentioned at List of supercentenarians from the United States. CommanderLinx (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.