Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnionMail.info


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:59, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

OnionMail.info

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG (et al.). I can't find any reliable sources about it at all. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 16:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 16:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 16:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep but rename to OnionMail. The current title is the project's website (http://en.onionmail.info/). Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The basis for the nomination is at WP:GNG. Could you explain how that could be applied? (basically for an article to exist on wikipedia it must be the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources). --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 16:53, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Sadly no evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. Wikicology (talk) 13:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Have to agree here. Some .onion sites are notable but this one comes nowhere near meeting WP:GNG.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 18:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.