Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online Blockchain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Online Blockchain

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP. Specifically there is no evidence of WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. The only instance of coverage in a potentially reliable source was run-of-the-mill/routine coverage in a single Bloomberg article of the stock-market price increasing when the name of the company changed. There is coverage in the Daily Express, but per WP:RSP the Daily Express is not considered a reliable source. Whilst the company is listed on AIM, this is not a major stock exchange comparable to NYSE and as such this is not a WP:LISTED case. Additionally, the article fails WP:PROMO as it is clearly promotional in content and was created by an apparent potential WP:COI account that has primarily edited articles related to Clem Chambers and his companies. There is no point in the edit history that is free of these WP:PROMO issues so WP:TNT applies. FOARP (talk) 16:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting if a firmer consensus than a soft delete can be established.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's difficult to search for such a generic name, but the available sources don't seem to meet WP:SIGCOV even if we ignore the reliability issues. –dlthewave ☎ 02:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.