Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online Questionnaire Design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 14:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Online Questionnaire Design

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is a how-to manual - not an encyclopedic article. Born2x 17:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Clearly a "how-to" guide, which is unsuitable for Wikipedia as described at "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information". I added a proposed deletion template to the article, which was removed by the creator. EALacey 17:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOT The Behnam 18:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:NOT and WP:OR. YechielMan 18:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Cantras 19:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I disagree, this page is a brief overview of online questionnaire design. It is not simply a how-to guide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.100.37.182 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 28 March 2007
 * Delete if not a howto then definitely original research. Guy (Help!) 22:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 23:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * DONT DELETEHey guys, pls leave it on for another week? We are still working on this and will try to make it better. It's just for a school project and by the end of next week it still isnt better then go ahead and delete it.  Just give us a week PLEASE!!. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.100.37.168 (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Comment. My objection to the article is not with its quality, but with its nature. It consists of statements about how an online questionnaire ought to be designed, which makes it simply unsuitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia could include an article discussing principles which reliable sources had proposed for questionnaire design, with full attribution. However, an article based on principles devised by the authors fails No original research. Have you considered writing your article on Wikibooks, which includes how-to guides? EALacey 19:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.