Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online travel in australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 13:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Online travel in australia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page completely fails WP:N  Digital Ninja  04:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to be an essay and doesn't differentiate between online travel in Australia and elsewhere. Capitalistroadster 04:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   —Capitalistroadster 04:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Hi there, sorry I'm still building upon this, and am going to add the external sources presently. I'm still coming to grips with the Wiki way of editing but it's starting to make sense. Thanks for being patient! Perthflights 05:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Hi there, sorry I'm still building upon this, and am going to add the external sources presently. I'm still coming to grips with the Wiki way of editing but it's starting to make sense. Thanks for being patient! Perthflights 05:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per Capitalistroadster. AniMate 05:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment As I said, I'm filling in a gap in information. I'm not sure exactly what company you think I might be trying to promote by adding this?Perthflights 05:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Wild Guess ???  Sheffield Steel talkstalk 18:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Patent nonsense essay. Keb25 05:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It is not patent nonsense, it actually makes good sense, but neither is it an encyclopaedia article. -- Mattinbgn\talk 05:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Alright, I will concentrate on giving the article some encyclopaedic weight - i admit it does come across as a bit of an essay in its current state, but i do want to create something others can draw upon for their own uses. Perthflights 05:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment My vote will change to a weak keep if you can demonstrate why this article is note worthy to someone unrelated to the industry, and supply a source (such as a press release *wink wink*) This is one of the largest obstacles in this deletion hearing.  Digital Ninja  05:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Hi - thanks for being such a help Ninja, I'll keep in mind that I need to account for a broader user base, and am sourcing published reading on this topic as we speak. Perthflights 06:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per capitalistroadster.-- Kerotan Leave Me a Message  Have  a nice day :) 08:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Capital. Twenty Years 09:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Capitalistroadster. That said, the creator does seem to know the field; might be interested in adding sourced material to Tourism in Australia. Recurring dreams 11:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment Because of this conversation on the authors talk page, I'm going to nominate this article for speedy deletion due to WP:N, WP:SPAM, and WP:patent_nonsense.
 * comment I've requested a name-change to remove any connection to any existing company. It was silly of me not to search for existing companies with that name before I signed but there we go. In addition, I'd be quite happy to merge some of this content with the Tourism In Australia page, but I'm struggling to see where any of the content overlaps. My article isn't wholly related to tourism so much as being a focus on travel agent options in the online domain, which might involve domestic flights or outgoing flights, which are quite separate from the tourism industry.Perthflights 01:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, and move sourced material to Tourism in Australia.  Sebi  [talk] 23:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - specially because of the utter vacuity of the Tourism in Australia article - the effort is needed there not on this article - if the editor is so inclined - that is where the effort is needed SatuSuro 03:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * comment No problems, I'll add any relevant data to the Tourism in Australia page and delete this page. Thank you all! Harveybirdman 06:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.