Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only Fourteen Worlds Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted as, if not quite patent nonsense, a CSD G2/G3 obvious joke page. Xoloz 01:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Only Fourteen Worlds Theory
Speedied as nonsence, tag removed. So here it is. DarkAudit 22:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC) ""Delete"" and it might need some protection as someone is intent on removing/altering the notice. --Charlesknight 22:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Keep - The article sheds some much needed insight into the ambiguity of the Many Worlds Interpretation, and I feel personally can offer a great deal to the current state of quantum physics...
 * Comment Some anonymous user went in and deleted the above nominating statement. It's put back. Speedy and block. --DarkAudit 01:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speediest of speedy deletes with added fire. Utter bilge; someone trying desperately to get into WP:BJAODN. ~ Matticus78 22:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy G1 per nom. Might scrape a G3 if the author is being obstreperous. Tevildo 22:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - yes keeps removing notice - anyway to make it "sticky"? --Charlesknight 22:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * This is not intended as a joke. Superbo 22:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The way I see it, Matticus78 just threatened to set Wikipedia on fire.

Keep - it may appear that I am the same person, but I'm actually from a different world than the previous person...  so I'm gonna go ahead and vote Keep on my 5:4 screen. Keep - Their minds could not handle it, and during their spells in mental health institutions trying to get their shattered worldviews back to how they were before the revelation they were visited by Them and hired as anti-evangelists in an attempt to suppress the truth. "In particular, if someone says that they think they can rework the "nonsense" into something worthwhile, then please give them some time and space to do so."
 * Delete as delusional bollocks. GassyGuy 22:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Bollocks as... wait what?
 * What...?
 * "I'm basically here for the entertainment value"
 * 10 points to whoever can place that oh so famous quote
 * I recommed delete. That's just silly. - and MoonlitDorian said this, but was too stupid to log in first.
 * You must ascend into the 15th world, sir.
 * Speedy delete as obvious nonsense and will keep tagging as such until an admin notices it. NawlinWiki 22:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hang on just one minute... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.98.222 (talk • contribs) NawlinWiki 22:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: After posting the above hangon request, User:68.81.98.222 proceeded to remove the speedy and AFD tags (again). NawlinWiki 22:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I did not. I just added a chess game, since everyone was hanging out on the page with nothing to do.  I figured we might as well play some chess and battle it out like real men.
 * My rook just took your queen, NawlinsWiki.
 * wait, are you white or black? let's start over.
 * Cryptofascists...
 * Speedy delete as complete nonsense. Alphachimp   talk  22:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, patently a joke or hoax. No references provided, does not meet the verifiability policy. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense; even the count is wrong, the fourteen different worlds and our own give a total of fifteen ;-) --Huon 23:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax. Skinnyweed 23:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, passes WP:CORP and WP:MUSIC. Recury 00:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as complete nonsense made up at school one day. Agent 86 00:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You must mean Keep as it was made up at a research university.Superbo 00:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Mmm, which research university? Any verifiable citation?  I thought not.  NawlinWiki 01:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. TheRingess 01:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, this article needs time to grow organically as all articles do. Taffmonster 01:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note the above user's only contributions to WP are to this and related articles and talk/deletion pages -- probably a sockpuppet of User:Superbo as was the anon IP. NawlinWiki 01:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (move to Patent Nonsense if anyone finds it funny enough). The discussion page is talking about a publication on it (which I doubt highly), but if it gets published it might then be a viable page to recreate. I'm doing a fair bit of assuming good faith here, I should add. BigHaz 01:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.